<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: MP3HD to take on FLAC codec</title> <atom:link href="http://www.playerbites.com/mp3hd-to-take-on-flac-codec-1497/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.playerbites.com/mp3hd-to-take-on-flac-codec-1497/</link> <description>MP3 Player Reviews &#38; News</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 15:03:04 +0000</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: audio codecs download</title><link>http://www.playerbites.com/mp3hd-to-take-on-flac-codec-1497/comment-page-1/#comment-1144</link> <dc:creator>audio codecs download</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 18 Jul 2010 18:01:47 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.playerbites.com/?p=1497#comment-1144</guid> <description>I think I will still take my 90% compression of MP3 192kbs over a 30% compression MP3HD, Since CDs are only 192kbs you wont gain anything from using this format unless you have access to extremley high quality source material.Read more: http://www.techradar.com/news/audio/is-mp3hd-the-future-of-digital-music--589674#ixzz0u3fbhiu4</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think I will still take my 90% compression of MP3 192kbs over a 30% compression MP3HD, Since CDs are only 192kbs you wont gain anything from using this format unless you have access to extremley high quality source material.</p><p>Read more: <a href="http://www.techradar.com/news/audio/is-mp3hd-the-future-of-digital-music--589674#ixzz0u3fbhiu4" rel="nofollow">http://www.techradar.com/news/audio/is-mp3hd-the-future-of-digital-music&#8211;589674#ixzz0u3fbhiu4</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: wonea</title><link>http://www.playerbites.com/mp3hd-to-take-on-flac-codec-1497/comment-page-1/#comment-765</link> <dc:creator>wonea</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 14:28:36 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.playerbites.com/?p=1497#comment-765</guid> <description>No thanks, I&#039;ve got a massive flac collection already.  Why add another codec into the mix when it&#039;s not better than CD-quality?  Why not partner with labels and give us true HD 5.1 audio, like what DVD-audio, SACD was.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No thanks, I&#8217;ve got a massive flac collection already.  Why add another codec into the mix when it&#8217;s not better than CD-quality?  Why not partner with labels and give us true HD 5.1 audio, like what DVD-audio, SACD was.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 1/11 queries in 0.033 seconds using disk
Content Delivery Network via N/A

Served from: www.playerbites.com @ 2010-09-06 12:03:37 -->